While explaining the wave like behaviour of photons in the double slit experiment, I have resurrected the concept of Ether. And I have proposed that Ether is nothing but a sea of photons permeating our entire universe. (http://debunkingrelativity.com/2013/12/08/explaining-the-double-slit-experiment/)
But if our universe is filled with photons and if we are living in a sea of photons, then why don’t we feel the same? Here is the explanation.
We know that we live in an environment filled with air which is nothing but a mixture of various gas molecules or ‘particles’. We can only feel these air particles around us only when there is movement of them. If the weather is absolutely still and there are no winds at all, we obviously don’t feel the air around us. That means for us to sense the presence of air around us, the particles of air must impinge upon our body with some force and our skin must be sensitive enough to sense these impacts.
But we know that even in the quietest of the quiet weathers (i.e. even when we think that the air is absolutely still without any winds), there will be some amount of random motion of the air particles and so they probably keep colliding with our skin albeit with a tiny force. But our skin is not usually sensitive enough to sense these weaker impacts coming from the randomly moving air particles. So we are not usually aware of the presence of air around us in still weather. (Or may be that, our sensory neural network has ‘learned’ to ignore these weak background impacts that we receive incessantly from the environment).
But imagine that we have a sensitive instrument that detects these weak collisions (i.e. those collisions resulting from the random motion of the air molecules in the absence of any net air movement or winds). The instrument obviously records a uniform and diffuse pattern of impacts because every inch of its surface receives an equal number of collisions. And the pattern and strength of impacts will remain the same in every direction the instrument ‘looks’.
Same thing is with our Ether which is nothing but a sea of photons. The mere presence of an object in our vicinity doesn’t mean that we will be able to feel the object. For us to feel and be aware of that object, there must be enough interaction between our sense organs and the object. Similarly, though we live in an environment filled with photons, unless there are Ether winds and unless the photons collide with our photosensitive retina with strong enough force, our eyes can’t see or feel the existence of Ether. And when we don’t receive strong collisions from the Ether particles, we don’t appreciate any light, in other words we see only darkness or ‘blackness’. So darkness is something that we feel when our photosensitive organs don’t receive any collisions from the sea of photons.
But even in the darkest of the dark spaces, there is possibly going to be some random motion of Ether particles similar to the random motion of air particles in the quietest of the quiet weathers. And similar to the detector that we have used above to sense the random motion of air particles, imagine that we have a sensitive detector that can sense and record the weak impacts due to the random motion of Ether particles. Obviously the detector would record the same uniform pattern of signals or impacts in every direction.
Do we have any experimental proof of this kind of random motion of Ether particles and which is same in every direction we look?
Yes. But our modern physicists, as is usually the case, have misinterpreted, misunderstood and mislabelled that as ‘Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation’ (CMBR). And as usual they have a weird explanation for that observation.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cosmic_microwave_background_radiation
Go to Next Page
Go to Main Index
Comments
The ether reasoning is starting to make more sense to me. Nikola Tesla is quoted as having said, “As I have searched the scientific records in more than half dozen languages for a long time without finding the least anticipation, I consider myself the original discoverer of this truth, which can be expressed by the statement: There is no energy in matter other than that received from the environment.” In school we are taught that EM waves are energy that can propagate without a medium, but Tesla seems to be saying that EM waves in fact propagate via the ether. This to me is more logical when you consider that energy is really “work done”, and textbook EM waves don’t really do any work. Not sure if that makes sense.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Tesla might be disappointed to learn that the idea of the ether preceded him by a few millennia. Moses wrote of it in Genesis 1, and called it the Firmament.
LikeLike
Also, if you look up the root Hebrew meanings of Firmament you will discover some interesting descriptions that sound a lot like this universal substance we’ve been talking about.
LikeLike
Have you looked at the Reciprocal System Theory and the improvements made on it by Bruce Peret and KV Nehru called RS2?
LikeLike
Actually it might be better for you to start with rs2theory.org and work your way down to Dewey B Larson’s original work as reference. Anywho, I think you’re on the right track and RS may enhance your understanding.
LikeLike
Thank you! I will try to explore that site.
(BTW, ‘vitriol’ is not my innate response but is only reactionary to the vitriolic response that I have received from the religious scientific folk on various forums for arguing against the superstitions of their science religion. And that is only reserved for them! Not everybody qualifies for that!)
LikeLike
CMB is not from the Big Bang. Well there is no Big Bang Let’s assume there was a Big Bang. Light from this explosion would leave the are faster than anything. Since there is no matter to bounce it back, it will continue to leave for ever. To see this light an observer would have to be 15 billion light years away and looking back toward the explosion. This crushes the CMB from the Big Bang explanation.
LikeLike
To Eric.
I always say there was no “Biggie Bangie”. There are lots of reason why, but I like to throw this one at scientist. I ask them how from ‘nothing’ ‘something’ can come. then they start talking gibberish and bullocks to which I never listen, and when they are done talking, well, lecturing would be a better word, then I quitly say, so, there is free energy after all. Then watch them rolling their eyes or have a fit. Isn’t that mean? 😉
LikeLike
I’ve just come across a fantastic unification theory. It reads nicely… I’d like to hear others opinions.
http://sci.physics.relativity.narkive.com/FMs4tA1E/debunking-physics-and-discovering-the-process-of-the-universe
Apparently he wrote a book. But its unavailable everywhere! The one copy I could find was over $300 US.
LikeLike
timbobob wrote:
“Tesla might be disappointed to learn that the idea of the ether preceded him by a few millennia. Moses wrote of it in Genesis 1, and called it the Firmament.”
I don’t think he would be disapointed. But we can never know for sure.
BUT Tesla was also aware of the Veda’s and things like that.
So , he might have seen the concept before.
Namaste!
Galacar
LikeLike
In his “Man’s greatest achievement” article, Tesla goes to the extent of saying that ether is everywhere and (almost) everything. Even what we observe as matter is just a realignment of photon-pool/ether/akasha, (whichever way we name it). And this realignment happens due to some ‘prana’ force acting on ether. What that ‘prana’ force is, why/when it acts or started acting, is a mystery.
Since the past many decades, we have progressed from calling molecule the most elementary particle of matter, to atoms, protons+neutrons+electrons, to quarks, leptons, fermions, bosons today (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elementary_particle). Yet unsure about what that/those elementary particle(s) is/are.
From: http://ieet.org/index.php/IEET/more/Prisco20151211
“Long ago he recognized that all perceptible matter comes from a primary substance, or a tenuity beyond conception, filling all space, the Akasha or luminiferous ether, which is acted upon by the life-giving Prana or Creative Force, calling into existence, in never ending cycles, all things and phenomena. The primary substance, thrown into infinitesimal whirls of prodigious velocity, becomes gross matter; the force subsiding, the motion ceases and matter disappears, reverting to the primary substance.”
BTW, Tesla himself mentions that man knew about Ether long long ago, has not discredited anyone.
‘I feel’ he tried tried to solve this (above) mystery, too ambitious, and in the process, did not concentrate on the relatively low hanging fruit (i.e. so many other inventions he he talked about, but did not take to completion e.g. the electric shield for cities and some other seemingly miraculous ones). Of course, something inspired him to go for it, but ultimately, many people ended up saying that he did nothing worthwhile after those initial inventions, all that he claimed later was merely big talk.
LikeLike
In his “Man’s greatest achievement” article, Tesla goes to the extent of saying that ether is everywhere and (almost) everything. Even what we observe as matter is just a realignment of photon-pool/ether/akasha, (whichever way we name it). And this realignment happens due to some ‘prana’ force acting on ether. What that ‘prana’ force is, why/when it acts or started acting, is a mystery.
Since the past many decades, we have progressed from calling molecule the most elementary particle of matter, to atoms, protons+neutrons+electrons, to quarks, leptons, fermions, bosons today (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elementary_particle). Yet unsure about what that/those elementary particle(s) is/are.
From: http://ieet.org/index.php/IEET/more/Prisco20151211
“Long ago he recognized that all perceptible matter comes from a primary substance, or a tenuity beyond conception, filling all space, the Akasha or luminiferous ether, which is acted upon by the life-giving Prana or Creative Force, calling into existence, in never ending cycles, all things and phenomena. The primary substance, thrown into infinitesimal whirls of prodigious velocity, becomes gross matter; the force subsiding, the motion ceases and matter disappears, reverting to the primary substance.”
BTW, Tesla himself mentions that man knew about Ether long long ago, has not discredited anyone.
‘I feel’ he tried tried to solve this (above) mystery, too ambitious, and in the process, did not concentrate on the relatively low hanging fruit (i.e. so many other inventions he he talked about, but did not take to completion e.g. the electric shield for cities and some other seemingly miraculous ones). Of course, something inspired him to go for it, but ultimately, many people ended up saying that he did nothing worthwhile after those initial inventions, all that he claimed later was merely big talk.
LikeLike
Just a couple of thoughts:
There is free energy. It’s called electric charge separation in space, which mainstream science denies.
I thought I had read that Tesla experimented with wireless energy. It was suppressed because no one could put a meter on it.
Kind of like the 100 mpg carburetor.
In Tesla’s time mysticism was in vogue. Did they not do the same thing in Europe during the Middle Ages? With their Earth-centred universe and epicycles? The math they used did indeed describe the motions of the planets, but it did so in a complicated and inaccurate way.
They seem to like their symbols.
LikeLike