Tag Archives: big bang

Ether or Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation (CMBR)

While explaining the wave like behaviour of photons in the double slit experiment, I have resurrected the concept of Ether. And I have proposed that Ether is nothing but a sea of photons permeating our entire universe. (http://debunkingrelativity.com/2013/12/08/explaining-the-double-slit-experiment/)

But if our universe is filled with photons and if we are living in a sea of photons, then why don’t we feel the same? Here is the explanation.

We know that we live in an environment filled with air which is nothing but a mixture of various gas molecules or ‘particles’. We can only feel these air particles around us only when there is movement of them. If the weather is absolutely still and there are no winds at all, we obviously don’t feel the air around us. That means for us to sense the presence of air around us, the particles of air must impinge upon our body with some force and our skin must be sensitive enough to sense these impacts.

But we know that even in the quietest of the quiet weathers (i.e. even when we think that the air is absolutely still without any winds), there will be some amount of random motion of the air particles and so they probably keep colliding with our skin albeit with a tiny force. But our skin is not usually sensitive enough to sense these weaker impacts coming from the randomly moving air particles. So we are not usually aware of the presence of air around us in still weather. (Or may be that, our sensory neural network has ‘learned’ to ignore these weak background impacts that we receive incessantly from the environment).

But imagine that we have a sensitive instrument that detects these weak collisions (i.e. those collisions resulting from the random motion of the air molecules in the absence of any net air movement or winds). The instrument obviously records a uniform and diffuse pattern of impacts because every inch of its surface receives an equal number of collisions. And the pattern and strength of impacts will remain the same in every direction the instrument ‘looks’.

Same thing is with our Ether which is nothing but a sea of photons. The mere presence of an object in our vicinity doesn’t mean that we will be able to feel the object. For us to feel and be aware of that object, there must be enough interaction between our sense organs and the object. Similarly, though we live in an environment filled with photons, unless there are Ether winds and unless the photons collide with our photosensitive retina with strong enough force, our eyes can’t see or feel the existence of Ether. And when we don’t receive strong collisions from the Ether particles, we don’t appreciate any light, in other words we see only darkness or ‘blackness’. So darkness is something that we feel when our photosensitive organs don’t receive any collisions from the sea of photons.

But even in the darkest of the dark spaces, there is possibly going to be some random motion of Ether particles similar to the random motion of air particles in the quietest of the quiet weathers. And similar to the detector that we have used above to sense the random motion of air particles, imagine that we have a sensitive detector that can sense and record the weak impacts due to the random motion of Ether particles. Obviously the detector would record the same uniform pattern of signals or impacts in every direction.

Do we have any experimental proof of this kind of random motion of Ether particles and which is same in every direction we look?

Yes. But our modern physicists, as is usually the case, have misinterpreted, misunderstood and mislabelled that as ‘Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation’ (CMBR). And as usual they have a weird explanation for that observation.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cosmic_microwave_background_radiation

 

Go to Next Page

Go to Main Index

Big Bang Stupidity

When Maxwell’s equations predicted the speed of Light as ‘C’ (i.e. 3×108m/sec), then all the physicist had rightly asked “C with reference to what?’’, until Einstein mesmerized them with his weird theory of relativity.

But the same crowd had failed to raise a similar question on the Big Bang singularity of infinite density and energy. ‘Infinite’ with reference to what?

Apparently our universe came into existence when a point of infinite density and energy (dubbed as ‘singularity’) exploded about 15 billion years ago. The weird theorists propose that Time and Space also came into existence only after the Big bang. Apparently space and time didn’t exist before that and even if they had existed, some preach that they shouldn’t influence things in our ‘present’ Universe.

Let’s use a little bit of our commonsense here (relativists and quantumists won’t of course!).

If the singularity was of infinite density and energy, this was with reference to what?

If we assume that there was ‘nothing’ (and not even space) outside this ‘point’ called singularity, there shouldn’t have been an explosion in the first instance because there was no energy gradient for the explosion to occur. On the other hand, if we believe that there was empty space around that singularity into which it exploded, then that implies that there was space even before, and the so called big bang just represents a local phenomenon in the already existing Universe. So it would be ridiculous to theorize that this Universe came into existence after big bang.

Also, if there was ‘nothing’ around the singularity and if big bang would still occur in this scenario, then even an electron or a photon could constitute a point of infinite density (with respect to the nothing around it) and could trigger a ‘big bang’. But our Universe has much more matter and energy.

Better if the cosmologists understand the real explanation for the ‘red shift’ without falling prey to the bizarre theories of relativity and quantum physics. And Ether model provides a much better explanation for all the observations including the so called ‘cosmic microwave background radiation’ (CMBR).
(The origin of Big bang theory: Astronomers have discovered that the farther away a galaxy is, the more red-shifted its light is. This implied for them that the farther away the galaxies are, the faster they are moving away. And scientists interpreted this red-shift data as evidence that the Universe, including space itself, is expanding. So if our universe is expanding, it must all have started from a single point (of infinite energy and density) in the very remote past, they concluded, and Big bang theory came into existence. And then they observed what is called as cosmic microwave background radiation which again they took as another evidence for the big bang theory.)